Progressive Prison Project
Innocent Spouse & Children Project
Greenwich, Connecticut
Me, Martoma and the Government’s Dirty Wins
By James Fleishman - Guest Blogger
James Fleishman contacted us the day after he was "featured" on PBS's Frontline's, "To Catch a Trader." He shared with us his compelling story - including being misled and misquoted on Frontline. We have since stayed in touch and invited him to write a guest blog. Our ministry's policy is to not comment on the tragedies of individuals - but we make no restrictions on guest bloggers.
Earlier this month former SAC hedge fund manager Matthew Martoma
walked out of a federal courthouse in Manhattan, freshly convicted on insider
trading charges that will likely imprison him for ten years or longer. His wife
Rosemary held his hand as they walked down the courthouse steps. The
press had followed the case closely and the attractive couple can be seen in
hundreds of shots outside the courthouse I know so well. In nearly all of these
pictures Mrs. Martoma is smiling widely and dressed very fashionably, clutching
her husband’s hand. She appears to be arriving at the symphony or ballet, not a
federal courthouse. Her husband always looks much more somber.
Minutes after the jury’s verdict, Mrs. Martoma held her husband’s
hand but looked miles away. You could tell she’d been crying. In one picture,
her eyes seemed to plead for ‘HELP’ as she stared directly into the camera
lens. She looked as if she was the one who’d just been convicted. Looking at
her, I thought about my own wife. I was alone when I walked down those same
steps after my conviction in September of 2011. My wife was home in California
with our infant and toddler. After seeing the candid, anguished shot of
Mrs. Martoma I was grateful for that.
After the Martoma verdict, the press was quick to applaud US
Attorney Preet Bharara for his perfect record (79-0) in his crusade against
insider trading over the past few years. He’s been on the cover of Time
Magazine and he was recently praised in Frontline’s completely one-sided
piece, To Catch a Trader, applauding
the government’s war on insider trading. Meanwhile, no one has gone to jail for
the mortgage-backed securities fraud that crippled our economy, costing
millions their jobs and homes. But we’re not supposed to spend too much time
thinking about that. The Feds want us to know there’s a new sheriff in town
busting the bad guys on Wall Street. Just as the government looked at
SAC’s outsized returns over the years with suspicion, the public should
understand what has fueled Bharara’s perfect record: cooperating witnesses
doing and saying anything to save their own skins.
Cooperators are the bedrock of our justice system. Sure, if
someone is caught up in wrongdoing and looking for a way out I don’t blame them
for agreeing to testify to whatever “facts” the government feeds them. But what happens when the government asks for help from someone who has committed lesser crimes than the government theorizes, or worse, has done nothing wrong at all? These victims of the government must either lie to stay out of prison, or risk their freedom in a rigged game they can’t win. This type of unjust government overreach isn't just occasional: it is the norm. It was used to convict me and possibly also Martoma.
for agreeing to testify to whatever “facts” the government feeds them. But what happens when the government asks for help from someone who has committed lesser crimes than the government theorizes, or worse, has done nothing wrong at all? These victims of the government must either lie to stay out of prison, or risk their freedom in a rigged game they can’t win. This type of unjust government overreach isn't just occasional: it is the norm. It was used to convict me and possibly also Martoma.
As we learned at Martoma’s trial, the only reason the Feds went
after him was to get him to cooperate against his billionaire boss, Steven
Cohen. When the FBI approached me in May of 2010 they made it clear that
it was not me, but my superiors they were interested in. They wanted me to wear
a wire to help incriminate the guys who ran my company and in exchange I could
have gotten probation. If I had been guilty or if I had had any reason
whatsoever to suspect my bosses of wrongdoing, I would have been happy for this
opportunity to stay with my family. The only problem was that I hadn’t seen any
crimes at my company and decided I didn’t want to help the Feds ruin more
innocent people’s lives. I chose not to lie about my involvement and others but
was convicted largely due to the testimony of those who chose the other path.
If you don't believe me, simply check out the public trial
transcripts for yourself. At my trial, government cooperators lied
repeatedly and my lawyer demonstrated this to the jury. A guy who worked with
me actually “forgot” his cell phone number (even its area code) in order to
keep us from proving his lie about a call that never took place. A consultant
testifying against me said I recruited him even though he signed on before I
even began at the company. Another consultant presenting detailed testimony of
my wrongdoing actually didn’t even know who I was before his arrest, and we
played a telephone call for the jury where he said just that. Despite the lies,
the jury decided to convict me. And those who testified against me, even those
who clearly broke the law in the worst of ways, were given probation or
immunity.
I have a lot in common with Martoma but there are some considerable
differences. Martoma made millions, while my salary never approached anything
close to seven figures. I paid for my own defense, which wiped us out
financially while Martoma’s team of high-priced lawyers was paid for by SAC.
Martoma was found guilty of using inside information to make huge profits for
himself and his firm. I was rung up on conspiracy charges. The government said
that I helped connect investors with people at my company who fed them inside
information but there were no profits directly linked to my involvement. Our
clients did thousands of calls a year with consultants. The FBI recorded
all the calls for six months and found that inside information was being
exchanged on less than 1% of these calls. I usually didn’t even set up these
calls and never participated in them. However the Feds said I knew about these
few calls where consultants were giving out inside information. I didn’t. I decided
to fight, knowing it would be a difficult battle but one I now understand to be
a dirty game that is impossible to win. No defendant has won a criminal insider
trading case in New York in over twenty years.
The question everyone wants to know is why did Martoma go to trial?
Why didn’t he turn on Cohen and accept the government’s help in maintaining his
freedom? Why would a father of three young children take this enormous risk
when he simply could have gotten a deal?
Martoma’s lawyers did a great job of discrediting the 80-year-old
doctor who testified in exchange for a sweetheart, non-prosecutorial deal with
the government. The doctor admitted to holes in his memory regarding his
meetings with Martoma from eight years prior but remarkably was able to recall
the most damning testimony in the weeks leading up to the trial. Martoma’s
multi-million-dollar defense team not only discredited the government’s star
witness but used a securities expert to prove the information provided by the
doctor had been made publicly available months before. Why did Martoma go to
trial? For the same reason I did. I think he believed he could win.
I consider myself lucky. I was sentenced to 30 months in prison. I
met guys in prison serving five or ten years on similar conspiracy charges. The
Fed’s war on insider trading is nothing but a publicity stunt to win public
approval after their failure to catch the real crooks behind the crimes that
brought about the Great Recession. Bharara will run for office. Several of the
prosecutors have already left for lucrative jobs with marquee firms as criminal
defense attorneys. These are the real “wins”. Meanwhile, the losses are piled
much higher in broken marriages and homes without fathers.
James Fleishman is an author, public speaker
and advocate for criminal justice rights, especially
as they relate to persons accused of
white collar crimes and their families.
His book, Inside Story, is compelling.
Kindle edition available on Amazon.
Walt Pavlo's Forbes column about
James Fleishman is worth reading.
____________________
Progressive Prison Project/
Innocent Spouse & Children Project
Rev. Jeff Grant, JD, M Div, Director
Christ Church Greenwich
254 East Putnam Avenue
Greenwich, Connecticut, USA 06830
(o) +1203.769.1096
(m) +1203.339.5887
jgrant@pppx.org
jg3074@columbia.edu
Innocent Spouse & Children Project
Rev. Jeff Grant, JD, M Div, Director
Christ Church Greenwich
254 East Putnam Avenue
Greenwich, Connecticut, USA 06830
(o) +1203.769.1096
(m) +1203.339.5887
jgrant@pppx.org
jg3074@columbia.edu
lspringer@innocentspousechildrenproject.org
(m) +1203.536.5508
Affiliates:
First Baptist Church of Bridgeport
126 Washington Avenue, 1st Floor
Bridgeport, Connecticut, USA 06604
Jesus Saves Ministries
784 Connecticut Avenue
Bridgeport. CT, 06607
Cathedral of Praise C.O.G.I.C. Int'l |
45 Gregory Street |
Bridgeport, CT 06604 |
I think the consensus view as to why Martoma DID NOT take/strike a deal with the US Attorney was that the government wasn't prepared to offer him the same "get out of jail free" card it passed to Dr. Gilman (who, certainly, by all intelligent moral reckoning was much more culpable in the scheme of things). The major reason associated with the government's unwillingness to go lighter on Martoma has to do with the fact that he apparently forged a Harvard Law Transcript and then passed it along - or attempted to pass it along - as authentic. This, in turn, undercut his utility to the government as a cooperating witness in that were Cohen to have been indicted, Martoma would have been easily savaged by defense counsel on this basis. Thus he would have been likely portrayed as wholly unreliable as a first hand relator and, resultantly, less valuable to the government against Cohen. I quite agree, however, with the idea that the government mounts these prosecutions - which amount to legal punishment for imputs which, net-net, make markets more efficient and involve no victims in reality. The better course woyuld be to punish so called insider trading on a lesser standard of proof but making the penalties associated only in the form of fines comprising sufficient multiples of ill-gotten gains attributed to deter overreaching on asymmetric information advantages which are perforce rife and will not be eradicated in any case. And it is entirely correct to suggest that this whole scheme whereof government lawyers use these prosecutions to make names for themselves has descended into being an almost uniquely unseemly circus. Before becoming a lawyer, I was schooled by my contracts professor in law school about the legal theorists who fashioned themselves as 'rules skeptics'. This brigade was led by the legendary Judge Jerome Frank and, even though the avatars of this movement are long since gone, they get proved right virtually every day as government lawyers - intent on self-aggrandizement - overreach in the course of such prosecutions. Thank you, James, for the post.
ReplyDeletePretty! This has been an incredibly wonderful article. Many thanks for
ReplyDeletesupplying this information.
Here is my homepage Atmos Rx vaporizer