Progressive Prison Project
Innocent Spouse & Children Project
Greenwich, Connecticut
The Need for Non-Legal Advisement
in the
Criminal Court Process
by, Joel Caldwell, Psy.D.- Guest Blogger
We had a wonderful conversation with Joel Caldwell a few
weeks ago on the telephone. While we admire anyone who
undertakes this kind of difficult and noble service, Joel seemed
particularly able, compassionate and with the spirit - so we
undertakes this kind of difficult and noble service, Joel seemed
particularly able, compassionate and with the spirit - so we
invited him to write a guest blog. We have not yet referred any
ministees to Joel so we cannot endorse his agency. - Jeff
The
criminal process is traumatic for anyone.
There are challenges personally and professionally that can be difficult
to overcome. Currently, when
someone is accused of a crime, there are limited resources for obtaining
assistance with the process.
Defense attorneys give legal advice and attempt to get the best outcome
in the courtroom. What about the
challenges outside of the courtroom?
How does the accused find emotional stability, limit professional
damage, and maintain relationships with family and friends? There is a significant need for
professional advisors who have been through the process and can aid the accused
through the personal hurdles of the pre-conviction, pre-sentencing, and
post-incarceration periods.
In 2011,
I faced charges related to Medicaid fraud. The fallout was swift and significant. I had to disclose to friends and
family what I had done. This was
especially difficult with my wife and children. I had to abandon a business I had worked to build and relied
on to provide security for my family.
There were unending financial consequences, and lifestyle changes that had
to be made. On top of everything
else, I had to prepare myself for jail time.
Since incarceration, I have been faced with the challenge
of putting my life back together both personally and professionally. Many relationships had to be mended and
my professional identity had to be re-established. These tasks have been daunting and I have received little
direction in overcoming these trials.
Those in the legal field are solely focused on obtaining the best
possible legal outcome and are ill-equipped to tackle these ancillary issues in
clients.
The current roles of mental health professionals in the
legal process are limited to a few well-defined areas. In criminal court cases, psychologists
and psychiatrists typically participate in evaluations to aid the legal
process. These include psychiatric
evaluation of those accused of criminal acts, pre-sentencing evaluations,
probation evaluations, evaluating the credibility of witnesses, child abuse evaluations,
competency evaluations, assessment of capacity, and psychological assessment of
offenders. These professionals may
also consult on factors pertaining to a trial such as jury selection.
Each of these evaluations has a specific focus. They tend to not be treatment-focused,
but are instead focused on facilitating a fair trial and appropriate
disposition of a case. After
undergoing these evaluations, a defendant feels no more equipped to handle the
process than before. The evaluations
are often conducted not for the client, but for the court.
When people have been charged with a crime and are going
through the legal process, psychotherapy is often the only choice they have in
receiving professional emotional support and guidance. While on the surface, this may seem
like an appropriate choice for exploring the emotions associated with being
accused of a crime, there are a few reasons why this is often not true.
It is a continuing reality that many people perceive a
strong stigma associated with psychotherapy. The Saginaw County Community Mental Health Authority[i]
states, “One in five Americans has a diagnosable mental illness. Stigma will keep most of them from
treatment.” Many people are
fearful of the potential consequences of being seen as a mental health
recipient. Moreover, clients going
through the stress of the legal process do not want the additional burden of
carrying a mental health diagnosis.
Psychotherapy also tends to have a broad focus. It is quite common for therapy to
involve a “whole-person” focus instead of a problem-specific focus. Depending upon the provider’s
therapeutic orientation, treatment methodologies could include extensive
discussion of topics which, from the client’s perspective, can seem unrelated
to the presenting problem. For
example, someone suffering from panic attacks may spend significant time
discussing their family of origin or failed relationships if the therapist
deems it appropriate.
The vast majorities of clients who are going through the
criminal process do not possess a mental illness and do not want to engage in a
process where others may view them as “crazy”. An alternative to psychotherapy is likely to be viewed as
welcomed by clients who are experiencing the criminal process for the first
time, who are feeling overwhelmed, and/or who desire advisement specifically
focused on the legal process.
I experienced the limitations of psychotherapy first-hand
when I was engaged with the legal system.
When I discovered that I was being charged with a crime, it felt like my
life was exploding. Every aspect
of life that seemed so certain for years was now unclear. Many questions came to mind in a matter
of moments: Would my marriage
survive this?; How do I tell my wife?; How do I tell my children?; What impact will this have on them?;
Will I ever work again?; Will I be ostracized professionally and socially?;
What will I have to give up? I
didn’t have the answers to any of these questions and began looking for someone
who could help.
I assumed that entering therapy would be my best option
primarily because, as a psychologist, I was familiar with it, and there were
really no other choices. I found a
therapist with whom I was comfortable, and explained that I was looking for
someone to be a source of support through this difficult time. Over the first few meetings, his focus changed
to looking at how I came to engage in illegal activity. It became a character study with much
attention placed upon my childhood and in “fixing” me. In retrospect, it is difficult to see
how our discussions related to my original questions. I wanted to know how I would make it through that difficult
time, not why I was going through it in the first place. My questions were specific to the
situation, and I never received those answers while in therapy.
The most difficult aspect of the criminal process is not
the prison experience but all of the changes in other areas of life. These include changes in the accused’s
family, their work, and their social life.
Being accused of a crime and experiencing the criminal
process can have a dramatic impact on loved ones. For the accused, it can be overwhelming in dealing with
family members during this time. There
will undoubtedly be questions from family regarding criminal details, and the explanation
of these requires sensitivity and discernment. Spouses and significant others often have a strong
emotional response to the client including shock, betrayal, and worry. Of particular importance is deciding
how much information to disclose to any involved children. How the client handles these responses
can have a significant impact on the future of those relationships.
The social impact of the criminal process can be
significant. It is a common
occurrence for a defendant to experience the loss of friendships. Depending on how widely publicized the case,
the client may face a more general social isolation. Experiencing a breakdown of a support system during a time
when support is needed most can be overwhelming. The client need not be a passive bystander. With the right approach, certain
relationships can actually be strengthened through this process.
A defendant will likely experience job loss and an
uncertain professional future as a result of a conviction. If the client was the primary source of
financial support for his/her family, this presents another significant worry
going forward. Recovering from a
conviction professionally can be especially challenging with the advent of the
internet. Among other things, it
has proven to be a database in which crime and conviction information will
always be available to the general public.
Once a prison sentence is completed, there continue to be
hurdles to overcome. For many,
professional re-establishment or re-invention is a primary task. Another important post-incarceration task is family
reintegration. Although this is
often a celebratory time for families, it is frequently a challenge for both
the client and family to re-adjust to one another.
The Progressive Prison Project and Innocent Spouse and
Children Project by Jeff Grant are two of a very few services attempting to
accomplish these difficult tasks.
In leading these Projects, Jeff is being transparent with his prior
struggles, his prison experience, and his transformation. His transparency, combined with his
knowledge base and spiritual perspective, is desperately needed by those
charged with a crime. It is my
hope and prayer that others who have been through the process will possess the
same conviction to make a similar impact.
Joel Caldwell, Psy.D. is co-founder of
Crisis Recovery Specialists. He
and his psychologist wife assist individuals and families
across the country with the personal, professional, and social fallout of the
legal process. For more
information about their services, visit www.recoveryfromcrisis.com.
___________________
Progressive Prison Project/
Innocent Spouse & Children Project are Missions of
Progressive Prison Ministries, Inc., a Church
at Christ Church Greenwich
254 East Putnam Avenue
Greenwich, Conecticut 06830
Mailing Address:
15 East Putnam Ave., #370
Greenwich, Connecticut 06830
Central Ministry & Office:
Weston, Connecticut
Innocent Spouse & Children Project are Missions of
Progressive Prison Ministries, Inc., a Church
at Christ Church Greenwich
254 East Putnam Avenue
Greenwich, Conecticut 06830
Mailing Address:
15 East Putnam Ave., #370
Greenwich, Connecticut 06830
Central Ministry & Office:
Weston, Connecticut
___________________________
Rev. Jeff Grant, JD, M Div, Minister/Director
(o) +1203.769.1096
Lynn Springer, Advocate
lspringer@prisonist.org
(m) +1203.536.5508
prisonist.org
Rev. Jeff Grant, JD, M Div, Minister/Director
(o) +1203.769.1096
(m) +1203.339.5887
jgrant@prisonist.org
jg3074@columbia.edu
jgrant@prisonist.org
jg3074@columbia.edu
Lynn Springer, Advocate
lspringer@prisonist.org
(m) +1203.536.5508
prisonist.org
[i] One in Five:
Overcoming the Stigma of Mental Illness; Saginaw County Community Mental Health
Authority; www.sccmha.org
No comments:
Post a Comment