Prisonist.org: Faith & Dignity
for the Days Ahead
Blogs, Guest Blogs & News
for the Days Ahead
Blogs, Guest Blogs & News
Family ReEntry's Testimony on
Criminal Justice Before the
Connecticut State Legislature
Appropriations Committee
Public Hearing:
Weds., Feb. 22, 2017, 6:30 pm
_____________
H.B. No. 7027 AN
ACT CONCERNING THE STATE BUDGET FOR THE BIENNIUM ENDING JUNE THIRTIETH 2019,
AND MAKING APPROPRIATIONS THEREFOR.
Good afternoon, Senator Formica, Senator
Osten, Representative Walker, and members of the Appropriations Committee.
My name is Jeff Grant and I am Executive Director
of Family ReEntry. Founded in 1984 in
Bridgeport, Family ReEntry’s mission is to develop, implement, and share
innovative and cost-effective solutions to the unprecedented numbers of people
involved in the criminal justice system. We contract with the Connecticut Department of
Correction and the Court Support Services Division, as well as other state
agencies, to provide services inside and outside of prison, in support of DOC’s
mission to “protect the public” and “provide offenders with opportunities for
successful community reintegration.”
Our
high-impact services for youth and families tackle the root causes of violent crime
through evidence-based social, cognitive
and behavioral interventions that restore healthy family functioning and assist
returning citizens in becoming positive contributing members of society. For
example, participants in our court-referred domestic/family violence programs
(n=1539) for 2014-2015 had a re-arrest rate of 8%, which is 60% lower than the
program benchmark for re-arrest rates set by the state (20%).
I would like to take this opportunity to applaud the bold
steps that this administration has taken to reduce the numbers of people in
prison through criminal justice reform and Second Chance Society legislation. Having served thirteen and a half months in a
federal prison myself for a white-collar crime I committed in 2001, I can personally attest
to the humanitarian value of second chances. Without the support from my wife, the faith
community and opportunities to volunteer with Family ReEntry when I came out of
prison, it is unlikely that I would be standing before you today as a
tax-paying citizen, non-profit leader and advocate for returning citizens.
All taxpayers in our state will benefit if Connecticut’s prison
population levels can be sustained or further decreased, so long as public
safety is not jeopardized. With these
goals in mind, Family ReEntry opposes the proposed one-million dollar cut to DOC’s
community support services, and requests that the amount remain at the same
level as last year ($34,803,726).
While we understand the pressing need for a balanced state
budget, we believe that cuts to community-based services are not in the best
interest of public safety or the longer-term fiscal health of our state.
With more individuals returning from prison and jail to our
communities, it is all the more urgent that we maintain our investment in
community services to ensure that recidivism rates do not increase. Research shows that when individuals
returning from prison do not have the social supports and resources they need
to rebuild their lives, they are much more likely to commit another crime and return
to prison within one to three years of release.[i]
The first six months in reentry are a critical time for intervention and for
linking individuals without the necessary supports to much needed behavioral
health, housing, legal aid and other rehabilitative services.[ii] Reentry service providers are on the front-lines
in preventing other critical problems our state faces as well, including
overdose deaths[iii]
and children from witnessing domestic violence.
Evidence-based community programs yield significant returns
on investment by reducing recidivism. As
stated in a PEW Center on the States report[iv]:
Policy makers must
confront the reality that, for the foreseeable future, roughly seven out of
every ten offenders will continue to serve all or part of their sentences in
the community. Ensuring public safety and balancing a budget, then, require
states to strengthen badly neglected community corrections systems, so they can
become credible options for more of the lowest risk offenders who otherwise
would be in prison.
The non-partisan Connecticut Regional Institute for the
21rst Century (CT21) report[v]
concerning the fiscal future of our state---recommends that, “The current
Department of Correction re‐entry programs both internal and
community based need to be funded and sustained” and they also warn that “Connecticut must resist temptation to reduce funding for these programs.” A 2006 national
opinion survey likewise indicates that the general public also favors
rehabilitative services for offenders, as opposed to a punishment-only approach
by an almost 8 to 1 margin[vi].
As the state continues to garner cost
savings from criminal justice reform measures, it would behoove the state
legislature to maintain the state’s investment in reentry services as part of justice
reinvestment. Everyone will be the beneficiary from front-line investments that
will help restore healthy families, increase public safety, rebuild our
communities and continue to reduce our prison population.
Thank you for your
attention to this important issue. Please
do not hesitate to contact me with any questions.
Respectfully
submitted,
Jeff Grant, JD, M
Div, Executive Director
Family ReEntry,
Inc.
75 Washington
Avenue
Bridgeport,
Connecticut 06604
FamilyReEntry.org
(o) 203-290-0855
(c) 203-957-0162
jeffgrant@familyreentry.org
[i] Kempker, G., Gibel, S., Giguere, R.
A (2010) Framework for Offender Reentry.
Silver Spring, Maryland. Center for Effective Public Policy.
[ii]
Source: Draine,
J., & Herman, D. B. (2007). Critical time intervention for reentry from
prison for persons with mental illness. Psychiatric Services, 58(12), 1577-1581.
[iii] Yale’s 2016 plan for Connecticut Opioid Response (CORE) states that 44 percent of fatal overdoses in Connecticut occurred among individuals
who had a history of having been detained by the DOC. For individuals with an opioid disorder
released from DOC, 60% of overdose deaths
occurred within six months of their release.
Retrieved from
http://www.plan4children.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/COREInitiativeForPublicComment.pdf
[iv]
Source: One in 31: The Long Reach of American Corrections; PEW Center on
the States; March 2009; page 22
[v]
Source: BlumShapiro
(2010). Connecticut
Regional Institute for the 21st Century: Assessment of Connecticut’s
Correction, Pardon and Parole (Report No. 2). Retrieved from http://www.ct21.org/attachments/article/116/prisonreportppt.pdf: page 37 [emphasis added].
[vi] Krisberg,
B. & Marchionna, S. (2006). Attitudes of U.S. Voters Toward Prisoner
Rehabilitation and Reentry Policies. Oakland, CA: National Council on Crime
and Delinquency.