The summer of 2007 was the most challenging of my professional career.
As
the Director of the Department of Correction’s Parole and Community
Services Division, I received the call from then Commissioner Theresa
Lantz advising me that the two men charged with the Cheshire murders
were under my Division’s supervision. Like all citizens of CT, I had
been horrified that week to learn of the brutality that had been visited
upon the Petit family.
As
the father of young children at that time, I was also struck by the
random nature of the crime, and the realization that even in my “safe”
community, my family was equally vulnerable. I was then at the 27 year
mark of a career in community corrections and proud of the role that it
played in public safety. The shock of that crime was also met with the
knowledge that I would be responsible to help ensure that crimes of that
nature would not be repeated. For the next two years until my
retirement, I kept a picture of the Petit family in my top right hand
desk drawer; a constant and personal reminder of the stakes involved.
Within
weeks of the Cheshire tragedy, men on parole were charged with several
other high profile violent crimes, prompting then DOC Commissioner
Theresa Lantz to suspend all further releases and to order a complete
review of the Department’s community release, supervision and support
services infrastructure. In addition to a renewed emphasis on
inter-agency information sharing (neither the Parole Board nor
supervising parole officers had complete prior arrest reports), and the
increased use of new technologies (i.e. Global Positioning Systems), DOC
reexamined the role of the parole officer, and reinvested in the tools
and resources they needed to better perform their responsibilities.
Chief among these concerns, was the recognition that evidence-based risk
and needs assessments, and the intervention strategies that they would
direct, would become an essential ingredient in addressing the complex
behavioral health needs of offenders; needs that when left unaddressed,
can substantially increase the likelihood of continued criminal
behavior.
In
the years that followed the Summer of 2007, CT made substantial
investments, in partnership with our non-profit provider network, to
streamline, expand and coordinate the number, type, and proficiency of
services available to the reentry population. Those investments
contributed, along with many other factors, to CT’s substantial
reduction in its prison population (from over 20,000 in ‘07 to
approximately 14,000 today).
Unfortunately,
as a result of our budget situation, these programs have experienced
severe reductions. Last year, DOC was forced to terminate contracts that
provided essential mental health, substance abuse and employment
services to men and women transitioning from incarceration to the
community. This year, additional budget cuts have already forced some
non-profits to shut their doors or roll back the services they provide.
The inability to learn from our past failures and our past successes,
will cost Connecticut not only in dollars, but in human misery.
Randy BrarenDirector of Reentry Initiatives, Family ReEntry, Inc,
Bridgeport, New Haven, Norwalk, CTFormer Director, Parole and Community Services Division, Department of Correction, State of Connecticut
No comments:
Post a Comment